Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

First Generation 996 Engine


Recommended Posts

There is an October article in 911 & Porsche World that discusses earlier M96 engines and AutoFarm's theory of seal and cylinder failures. Very interesting and contradicts other articles written on the subject RMS failures. Not very flattering for Porsche. The saga continues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an October article in 911 & Porsche World that discusses earlier M96 engines and AutoFarm's theory of seal and cylinder failures.  Very interesting and contradicts other articles written on the subject RMS failures. Not very flattering for Porsche.  The saga continues

Can you summarize their theory for us. I thought the cause was pretty well determined. Would be interested in hearing details. Thanks :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't very much information quoted from Autofarm in the article. I don't think this article significantly changes what is known about "RMS" leaks since a "RMS" leak has become a garbage dump term used to describe leaks from more than the RMS in the M96 engine. All this aside, Autofarm seems to be offering there expertise in rebuilding early M96 engines. It was only a matter of time before shops started taking these engines apart. I don't think you'll see this type of service offered for the M96 03 engines until a significant number start coming out of warranty.

It remains to be seen if there solution, which was not revealed in detail, will be durable and cost less than an exchange motor from Porsche. A 3.8L conversion is interesting, but again it has yet to be tested by any of the major publications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.