Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hesitate to say it, but I think my MAF coded check engine light has been banished. Was getting the P1128(?) code indicating MAF issues. Took it to Porsche and they said it was intermittent and had occured five times during a three day period. I suspected that the previous owner's K&N filter may have been a contributor so I picked up an exhorbitantly overpriced paper factory filter from them while I was there. (The only good thing is that they didn't charge me for the ECU check :D )

Anyway, replaced it and cleared the codes out. Been two days of fairly heavy driving and idling with no CEL at all. Had a MAC scanner hooked up to it to log the data if it popped up and it never did. :clapping:

So, anyone want to buy a dirty K&N panel filter for a 996?

Posted
I hesitate to say it, but I think my MAF coded check engine light has been banished.  Was getting the P1128(?) code indicating MAF issues.  Took it to Porsche and they said it was intermittent and had occured five times during a three day period.  I suspected that the previous owner's K&N filter may have been a contributor so I picked up an exhorbitantly overpriced paper factory filter from them while I was there.  (The only good thing is that they didn't charge me for the ECU check :D )

Anyway, replaced it and cleared the codes out.  Been two days of fairly heavy driving and idling with no CEL at all.  Had a MAC scanner hooked up to it to log the data if it popped up and it never did.  :clapping:

So, anyone want to buy a dirty K&N panel filter for a 996?

K & N filters are very good. The trick is not to use very much oil and after you clean and re-oil the filter is to let the filter leach out any excess oil before you put it in your car. I put mine in a brown paper grocery bag and let it sit overnite...then put it in the car and never have had it throw a code.

Keep the K & N filter. Go down to the car store and get some of their Filter cleaning soap and some K & N oil. Use only their products. Clean real good and let dry in the sun...then LIGHLY re-oil the filter and let it soak out on some paper or in a paper bag.

I think you will be pleasantly surprised how well they do work...

Good luck

Posted

Jim, I think the K&N may serve some purposes, especially when the filter element has been fully loaded with debris/dirter. However, the tests I've seen that compare flow rates for 'new' OEM and K&N show no difference in flow rates. However, the data indicates some lesser filtration by K&N compared to OEM paper. If I can find the links to the testing, I'll post 'em here. That said, I think your method for avoiding excess oiling is a great idea. :thumbup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.