Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, the fuel trims should be zero for both short and long term ideally but under operation, the short + long should add up to be less than 10% or so for a healthy engine. Yours add up to 25+%, which is A LOT of fuel added.

 

The reason I asked for Durametric is because it shows fuel trims for idle (RKAT) and under load (FRA) so if you have a vacuum leak, you will see a high positive % for RKAT but not so much correction for FRA because under load, there's not much vacuum in the intake manifold so vacuum leak will not affect the engine much.

  • Moderators
Posted

I think I'm going to take that hose off again and tape the rest of it as it crackled anytime I moved it during removal.

 

I think it is way past time to stop trying to repair the hose and just replace it.  When they get that bad, they are past their sell by date.

Posted (edited)

Yes, the fuel trims should be zero for both short and long term ideally but under operation, the short + long should add up to be less than 10% or so for a healthy engine. Yours add up to 25+%, which is A LOT of fuel added.

 

The reason I asked for Durametric is because it shows fuel trims for idle (RKAT) and under load (FRA) so if you have a vacuum leak, you will see a high positive % for RKAT but not so much correction for FRA because under load, there's not much vacuum in the intake manifold so vacuum leak will not affect the engine much.

Ok yeah, thats pretty much what that blurb about revving to 2500 alluded to.  Thanks!

Edited by 5thlilpiggy
Posted (edited)

I think I'm going to take that hose off again and tape the rest of it as it crackled anytime I moved it during removal.

 

I think it is way past time to stop trying to repair the hose and just replace it.  When they get that bad, they are past their sell by date.

 

 

Yeah, youre right   :cheers:

That is #14 in the diagram. If #15 is also bad, how much of a PITA is that to replace? I assume you remove the wheel well cover?

post-94939-0-32776400-1462498557_thumb.j

Edited by 5thlilpiggy
  • Moderators
Posted

It varies by year and model, but going in through the wheel well us usually the easiest.  No special tools are required and the hose ends have pinch to release fittings on them, just be sure to lightly oil the seal rings inside the new hose ends before installing.

Posted (edited)

Im almost too embarrassed to post this, but its a good PSA reminder...

 

Took the kid to school this morning, and when I got to the garage and put it in P, I got the "excuse me sir, there's a hole in the engine" idle jump to about 1500 rpms.

 

Pulled the intake and found the attached image (sorry for the ****ty pic...I was upset  :cursing: ).

 

Moral: Be careful when you put the intake back on or the water pump pulley will have a party with your PCV.

 

Thankfully, the MPLS dealer actually has that rubber T in stock.  

 

In order to get there though, I had to remedy the T.  Taped it up (Im becoming a huge fan of 3M super33+) and went for a short drive with live data going on the scanner.  All was well.  STFTs bouncing +/- in single digits with LTFTs at 0.

 

Got to the garage, put it in P and watched the readings for a couple min.  Got the same readings with LTFTs staying at 0.

 

Hoping to be at the end of this!

post-94939-0-23109200-1462543712_thumb.j

Edited by 5thlilpiggy
Posted (edited)

Dealer closed before I could get in over the weekend.  No codes over that time with the taped T hose.

 

Got the replacement in today (made sure it was in its proper place under the intake) and went for a short drive with no codes.

 

Other than having to get a replacement for the plastic hose at some point, I think we are done here  :D

Edited by 5thlilpiggy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.