Jump to content

Welcome to RennTech.org Community, Guest

There are many great features available to you once you register at RennTech.org
You are free to view posts here, but you must log in to reply to existing posts, or to start your own new topic. Like most online communities, there are costs involved to maintain a site like this - so we encourage our members to donate. All donations go to the costs operating and maintaining this site. We prefer that guests take part in our community and we offer a lot in return to those willing to join our corner of the Porsche world. This site is 99 percent member supported (less than 1 percent comes from advertising) - so please consider an annual donation to keep this site running.

Here are some of the features available - once you register at RennTech.org

  • View Classified Ads
  • DIY Tutorials
  • Porsche TSB Listings (limited)
  • VIN Decoder
  • Special Offers
  • OBD II P-Codes
  • Paint Codes
  • Registry
  • Videos System
  • View Reviews
  • and get rid of this welcome message

It takes just a few minutes to register, and it's FREE

Contributing Members also get these additional benefits:
(you become a Contributing Member by donating money to the operation of this site)

  • No ads - advertisements are removed
  • Access the Contributors Only Forum
  • Contributing Members Only Downloads
  • Send attachments with PMs
  • All image/file storage limits are substantially increased for all Contributing Members
  • Option Codes Lookup
  • VIN Option Lookups (limited)

Recommended Posts

Posted

I changed my MAF due to a number of CAT and Fueling errors and laclustre performance - revs slow to rise.

I then read about the AOS and discovered mine had gone and was leaking and relaced it

The car (2.5) was then VERY fast to drive but idled appauling and errored P1127 P1129 and had dangerous hesitation when pulling away from junctions

Put the old MAF back in and noticed perfect idle but the performance has gone again. There are now no errors so presumably my AOS and dirty throttle was causing the very original errors.

I also noticed my Durametric says 35kg/hr at idle with the new MAF and 14kg/hr (I beleive I read 14 is about right)

So is it likely my original MAF is faulty (slow to respond) and the new one isnt the right type and is calibrated wrongly and I need to source the right one and that will give good idle AND performance

Or do I just have to accept with the right MAF a 2.5 aint that much fun - cos with the 'wrong' MAF it was looney at speed

Seems quite a common problem people report they change the MAF then get bad idle

Posted
I changed my MAF due to a number of CAT and Fueling errors and laclustre performance - revs slow to rise.

I then read about the AOS and discovered mine had gone and was leaking and relaced it

The car (2.5) was then VERY fast to drive but idled appauling and errored P1127 P1129 and had dangerous hesitation when pulling away from junctions

Put the old MAF back in and noticed perfect idle but the performance has gone again. There are now no errors so presumably my AOS and dirty throttle was causing the very original errors.

I also noticed my Durametric says 35kg/hr at idle with the new MAF and 14kg/hr (I beleive I read 14 is about right)

So is it likely my original MAF is faulty (slow to respond) and the new one isnt the right type and is calibrated wrongly and I need to source the right one and that will give good idle AND performance

Or do I just have to accept with the right MAF a 2.5 aint that much fun - cos with the 'wrong' MAF it was looney at speed

Seems quite a common problem people report they change the MAF then get bad idle

Early Boxsters (non E-gas) have an idle control valve which, if it is faulty or all gummed up, can produce some of the symptoms that you have described.

Take a look at this thread and the posts by "Stefan", it may solve your problems, or at least help you eliminate one of the possible causes:

http://www.renntech.org/forums/index.php?s...ic=17313&hl

With respect to the MAF, if you got the later style MAF, it will not function properly in your early Boxster unless you have the DME reprogrammed. On the plus side, the design of the later style MAF makes it less prone to fouling.

Regards, Maurice.

Posted

As far as I can tell, the 986 606 125 01 is only for EGAS cars and doesn't work properly in the cable cars. I have also ran 10-15 of these in cars without any special programming, they run just fine and pass smog in CA.

B

What is the part number on the MAF in the car currently? I have people calling me all the time trying to use the VW/Audi Mafs.. and they do not work.

B

Posted
As far as I can tell, the 986 606 125 01 is only for EGAS cars and doesn't work properly in the cable cars. I have also ran 10-15 of these in cars without any special programming, they run just fine and pass smog in CA.

B

What is the part number on the MAF in the car currently? I have people calling me all the time trying to use the VW/Audi Mafs.. and they do not work.

B

There isnt actually a part number on the new sensor - though I did notice that on the new one there is like some kind of bead thermister (blue) in the top air path that isnt on the old one.

Do you think my -what i consider- to be poor performance and slow responce on my original MAF sounds like failure or just cos its the right one

I have to confess I did get it off ebay :*)

Posted
This is where the part number is located. I sell/sold MAFS on eBay for a long time, so we are not ALL bad :)

B

Hmmm nothing on my new one - suspect I've been sold a dud

Is my experience of the poor performance - revs rise pretty slowly - a symptom of a failing MAF?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.